On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 5:36 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Devices sharing a reset GPIO could use the reset framework for
> coordinated handling of that shared GPIO line. We have several cases of
> such needs, at least for Devicetree-based platforms.
>
> If Devicetree-based device requests a reset line, while "resets"
> Devicetree property is missing but there is a "reset-gpios" one,
> instantiate a new "reset-gpio" platform device which will handle such
> reset line. This allows seamless handling of such shared reset-gpios
> without need of changing Devicetree binding [1].
>
> To avoid creating multiple "reset-gpio" platform devices, store the
> Devicetree "reset-gpios" GPIO specifiers used for new devices on a
> linked list. Later such Devicetree GPIO specifier (phandle to GPIO
> controller, GPIO number and GPIO flags) is used to check if reset
> controller for given GPIO was already registered.
>
> If two devices have conflicting "reset-gpios" property, e.g. with
> different ACTIVE_xxx flags, this would allow to spawn two separate
> "reset-gpio" devices, where the second would fail probing on busy GPIO
> request.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YXi5CUCEi7YmNxXM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [1]
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/reset/core.c | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/reset-controller.h | 4 +
> 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index 4d5a78d3c085..86e33a703ad2 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -10,9 +10,13 @@
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/kref.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -23,6 +27,11 @@ static LIST_HEAD(reset_controller_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(reset_lookup_mutex);
> static LIST_HEAD(reset_lookup_list);
>
> +/* Protects reset_gpio_lookup_list */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(reset_gpio_lookup_mutex);
> +static LIST_HEAD(reset_gpio_lookup_list);
> +static DEFINE_IDA(reset_gpio_ida);
> +
> /**
> * struct reset_control - a reset control
> * @rcdev: a pointer to the reset controller device
> @@ -63,6 +72,16 @@ struct reset_control_array {
> struct reset_control *rstc[] __counted_by(num_rstcs);
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct reset_gpio_lookup - lookup key for ad-hoc created reset-gpio devices
> + * @of_args: phandle to the reset controller with all the args like GPIO number
> + * @list: list entry for the reset_gpio_lookup_list
> + */
> +struct reset_gpio_lookup {
> + struct of_phandle_args of_args;
> + struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> static const char *rcdev_name(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev)
> {
> if (rcdev->dev)
> @@ -813,13 +832,183 @@ static void __reset_control_put_internal(struct reset_control *rstc)
> kref_put(&rstc->refcnt, __reset_control_release);
> }
>
> +static bool __reset_gpios_args_match(const struct of_phandle_args *a1,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *a2)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!a2)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (a1->args_count != a2->args_count)
> + return false;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < a1->args_count; i++)
> + if (a1->args[i] != a2->args[i])
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int __reset_add_reset_gpio_lookup(int id, struct device_node *np,
> + unsigned int gpio,
> + unsigned int of_flags)
> +{
> + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup __free(kfree) = NULL;
> + struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = NULL;
> + char *label __free(kfree) = NULL;
I got yelled at by Linus Torvalds personally for doing it like this. I
know this is a common pattern in code using GLib but Linus wants auto
variables to be initialized where they're declared...
> + unsigned int lookup_flags;
> +
> + /*
> + * Later we map GPIO flags between OF and Linux, however not all
> + * constants from include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h and
> + * include/linux/gpio/machine.h match each other.
> + */
> + if (of_flags > GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) {
> + pr_err("reset-gpio code does not support GPIO flags %u for GPIO %u\n",
> + of_flags, gpio);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + gdev = gpio_device_find_by_fwnode(of_fwnode_handle(np));
... so this should become:
struct gpio_device *gdev __free(gpio_device_put) = gpio_device_find(...)
and same for the rest.
Don't get me wrong, I love cleanup.h but there's a (unofficial for
now) coding style.
> + if (!gdev)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> + label = kstrdup(gpio_device_get_label(gdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!label)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Size: one lookup entry plus sentinel */
> + lookup = kzalloc(struct_size(lookup, table, 2), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!lookup)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + lookup->dev_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "reset-gpio.%d", id);
> + if (!lookup->dev_id)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + lookup_flags = GPIO_PERSISTENT;
> + lookup_flags |= of_flags & GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
> + lookup->table[0] = GPIO_LOOKUP(no_free_ptr(label), gpio, "reset",
> + lookup_flags);
> +
> + gpiod_add_lookup_table(no_free_ptr(lookup));
You told me that this doesn't need to be removed or ever freed but a
comment on that would be in order.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * @reset_args: phandle to the GPIO provider with all the args like GPIO number
> + */
> +static int __reset_add_reset_gpio_device(const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> +{
> + struct reset_gpio_lookup *rgpio_dev;
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + int id, ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Registering reset-gpio device might cause immediate
> + * bind, resulting in its probe() registering new reset controller thus
> + * taking reset_list_mutex lock via reset_controller_register().
> + */
> + lockdep_assert_not_held(&reset_list_mutex);
So how does dumping the stack help here exactly?
> +
> + mutex_lock(&reset_gpio_lookup_mutex);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(rgpio_dev, &reset_gpio_lookup_list, list) {
> + if (args->np == rgpio_dev->of_args.np) {
> + if (__reset_gpios_args_match(args, &rgpio_dev->of_args))
> + goto out; /* Already on the list, done */
> + }
> + }
> +
> + id = ida_alloc(&reset_gpio_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (id < 0) {
> + ret = id;
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Not freed in normal path, persisent subsystem data (which is assumed
> + * also in the reset-gpio driver).
> + */
> + rgpio_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rgpio_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rgpio_dev) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_ida_free;
> + }
> +
> + ret = __reset_add_reset_gpio_lookup(id, args->np, args->args[0],
> + args->args[1]);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_kfree;
> +
> + rgpio_dev->of_args = *args;
> + /*
> + * We keep the device_node reference, but of_args.np is put at the end
> + * of __of_reset_control_get(), so get it one more time.
> + * Hold reference as long as rgpio_dev memory is valid.
> + */
> + of_node_get(rgpio_dev->of_args.np);
> + pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "reset-gpio", id,
> + &rgpio_dev->of_args,
> + sizeof(rgpio_dev->of_args));
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_put;
> +
> + list_add(&rgpio_dev->list, &reset_gpio_lookup_list);
> +
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&reset_gpio_lookup_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_put:
> + of_node_put(rgpio_dev->of_args.np);
> +err_kfree:
> + kfree(rgpio_dev);
> +err_ida_free:
> + ida_free(&reset_gpio_ida, id);
> +err_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&reset_gpio_lookup_mutex);
> +
You're already using cleanup helpers above, why not here too? Would
make this function much more readable and allow you to drop all but
the ida_free() here. Possibly you'd need to define the __free()
callback for of_node_put() though.
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct reset_controller_dev *__reset_find_rcdev(const struct of_phandle_args *args,
> + bool gpio_fallback)
> +{
> + struct reset_controller_dev *r, *rcdev;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&reset_list_mutex);
> +
> + rcdev = NULL;
> + list_for_each_entry(r, &reset_controller_list, list) {
> + if (args->np == r->of_node) {
> + if (gpio_fallback) {
> + if (__reset_gpios_args_match(args, r->of_args)) {
> + rcdev = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + } else {
> + rcdev = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return rcdev;
> +}
> +
> struct reset_control *
> __of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node, const char *id, int index,
> bool shared, bool optional, bool acquired)
> {
> + struct of_phandle_args args = {0};
> + bool gpio_fallback = false;
> struct reset_control *rstc;
> - struct reset_controller_dev *r, *rcdev;
> - struct of_phandle_args args;
> + struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev;
> int rstc_id;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -839,39 +1028,49 @@ __of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node, const char *id, int index,
> index, &args);
> if (ret == -EINVAL)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> - if (ret)
> - return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(ret);
> + if (ret) {
> + /*
> + * There can be only one reset-gpio for regular devices, so
> + * don't bother with GPIO index.
> + */
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, "reset-gpios", "#gpio-cells",
> + 0, &args);
> + if (ret)
> + return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> - mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
> - rcdev = NULL;
> - list_for_each_entry(r, &reset_controller_list, list) {
> - if (args.np == r->of_node) {
> - rcdev = r;
> - break;
> + gpio_fallback = true;
> +
> + ret = __reset_add_reset_gpio_device(&args);
> + if (ret) {
> + rstc = ERR_PTR(ret);
> + goto out_put;
> }
> }
>
> + mutex_lock(&reset_list_mutex);
> + rcdev = __reset_find_rcdev(&args, gpio_fallback);
> if (!rcdev) {
> rstc = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> if (WARN_ON(args.args_count != rcdev->of_reset_n_cells)) {
> rstc = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> rstc_id = rcdev->of_xlate(rcdev, &args);
> if (rstc_id < 0) {
> rstc = ERR_PTR(rstc_id);
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> /* reset_list_mutex also protects the rcdev's reset_control list */
> rstc = __reset_control_get_internal(rcdev, rstc_id, shared, acquired);
>
> -out:
> +out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&reset_list_mutex);
> +out_put:
> of_node_put(args.np);
I suggest reworking this to use cleanup.h as well.
Bartosz
>
> return rstc;
> diff --git a/include/linux/reset-controller.h b/include/linux/reset-controller.h
> index 0fa4f60e1186..e064473215de 100644
> --- a/include/linux/reset-controller.h
> +++ b/include/linux/reset-controller.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ struct reset_control_lookup {
> * @dev: corresponding driver model device struct
> * @of_node: corresponding device tree node as phandle target
> * @of_reset_n_cells: number of cells in reset line specifiers
> + * TODO: of_args have of_node, so we have here duplication
> + * @of_args: for reset-gpios controllers: corresponding phandle args with GPIO
> + * number complementing of_node
> * @of_xlate: translation function to translate from specifier as found in the
> * device tree to id as given to the reset control ops, defaults
> * to :c:func:`of_reset_simple_xlate`.
> @@ -74,6 +77,7 @@ struct reset_controller_dev {
> struct device *dev;
> struct device_node *of_node;
> int of_reset_n_cells;
> + const struct of_phandle_args *of_args;
> int (*of_xlate)(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> const struct of_phandle_args *reset_spec);
> unsigned int nr_resets;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]
