On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 01:51:03PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/01/2024 12:37, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:07:30PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote: > >> If restricting things here is really important, defaulting to 0 (with a > >> comment explaining it) and letting actual devices then override the > >> value would feel less 'made up' > Wait, what do you mean by "letting actual devices then override"? It's > already like this. Nothing changed. What do you refer to? The suggestion is that instead of limiting to 1 and having one device override limit to 0 and have all the devices that need 1 override as well.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- References:
- [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- From: Jerome Brunet
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: dai-common: Narrow possible sound-dai-cells
- Index(es):