On 12/11/23 07:58, Venkata Prasad Potturu wrote:
>
> On 12/10/23 21:20, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> On 12/10/23 16:01, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 12:12:53PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/23 11:51, Venkata Prasad Potturu wrote:
>>>>> This should send to SOF git repo for rewiew, once SOF reviewers
>>>>> approved
>>>>> this, again need to send to broonie git.
>>>>> All the changes in sound/soc/sof/ path should go to SOF git.
>>>> Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the SOF dev workflow. So it's not
>>>> enough to have this patch cc-ed to
>>>> sound-open-firmware@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
>>> The SOF people basically do their own thing in github at
>>>
>>> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux
>>>
>>> with a github workflow and submit their patches upstream in batches a
>>> few times a release, however my understanding is that their workflow can
>>> cope with things going in directly upstream as well.
>> Thanks for clarifying, Mark! That would greatly simplify and speedup
>> the whole process, at least for trivial patches like this one.
>
> Hi Cristian,
>
> We have created a Pull request in SOF git hub for I2S BT support.
> please hold v2 version SOF patches till below PR get's merged.
> PR:- https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/4742
Hi Venkata,
If this is going to be handled via the github workflow, this patch
should be removed from the series. Since there is no dependency on it,
I cannot see a reason to put v2 on hold.
Do I miss something?
Thanks,
Cristian
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]