Re: [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: codecs: Add WCD939x Codec driver

[Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:49:15PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:

> +	if (wcd939x->variant == WCD9390) {
> +		if (mode_val == CLS_H_HIFI || mode_val == CLS_AB_HIFI) {
> +			dev_info(component->dev, "%s: Invalid HPH Mode, default to CLS_H_ULP\n",
> +				 __func__);
> +			mode_val = CLS_H_ULP;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (mode_val == CLS_H_NORMAL) {
> +		dev_info(component->dev, "%s: Invalid HPH Mode, default to class_AB\n",
> +			 __func__);
> +		mode_val = CLS_H_ULP;
> +	}

This lets people spam the logs from userspace, why not just return an
error?

> +	if (hphr)
> +		wcd939x->comp2_enable = value;
> +	else
> +		wcd939x->comp1_enable = value;

Are there really no constraints on the values for these things?

> +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new wcd9390_snd_controls[] = {
> +	SOC_ENUM_EXT("EAR PA GAIN", wcd939x_ear_pa_gain_enum,
> +		     wcd939x_ear_pa_gain_get, wcd939x_ear_pa_gain_put),

Gains should be be named Volume.  Is there no TLV information?

> +static irqreturn_t wcd939x_wd_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}

Why even request the interrupt if it's just going to be ignored?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature