> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 4:14 PM
(...)
> Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus
> historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and
> there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
> 1. Compatibles should be specific.
> 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
>
> Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like compatibles.
>
> While re-indenting the first enum, put also axis,artpec8-dw-mshc in
> alphabetical order.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter for
> explanation.
> ---
> .../bindings/mmc/samsung,exynos-dw-mshc.yaml | 25 ++++++++++++------
> -
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
(...)
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]