On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 11:43:28AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Samsung Exynos SoC reuses several devices from older designs, thus > historically we kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine > and there is no bug here, however guidelines expressed in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that: > 1. Compatibles should be specific. > 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features. > > Add compatibles specific to each SoC in front of all old-SoC-like > compatibles. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > I propose to take the patch through Samsung SoC (me). See cover letter > for explanation. I am fine that you take it once all review comments are addressed. Given that: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [PATCH 00/17] dt-bindings: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH 02/17] dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH 00/17] dt-bindings: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add analog audio to RK3588 EVB1
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/17] dt-bindings: i2c: samsung,s3c2410-i2c: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/17] dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 02/17] dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
- Index(es):