On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:45:29AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > Do you mean I send my RFC patch as the formal patch, and let other boards > which use the wm8731 to add clk object, am I right? No, we need to keep the boards working so we either need patches adding the fixed clocks for existing boards or we need to have the handling of missing clocks that Manuel suggested.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- From: Bo Shen
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- From: Manuel Lauss
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- From: Manuel Lauss
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- From: Bo Shen
- [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- Next by Date: [PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- Next by thread: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
- Index(es):