On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:15:51AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > On 03/21/2014 07:55 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:37:47AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:51:02AM +0000, Bo Shen wrote: > >>>+ - wlf,sysclk-from-mclk: set the sys clock is driven from mclk, > >>Why can the kernel not decide this? > >It can. > I really don't know how it decided by kernel (hardcode in machine driver ?), > can you point me directly? Thanks. It can just look to see if there is a suitable system clock present, this shouldn't be hard. If there's a clock connected at a suitable rate it should use that, otherwise if there's a clock at an unsuitable rate it should either change the rate of the clock or use the FLL.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- From: Bo Shen
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- References:
- [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- From: Bo Shen
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- From: Mark Rutland
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- From: Bo Shen
- [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8904: add CCF support
- Index(es):