On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:22:03PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > On 11/20/2012 16:57, Mark Brown wrote: > >If you're using dmaengine you really need a *very* good reason not to > >use the core dmaengine support... > You mean I should using the soc-dmaengine-pcm, am I right? Yes, that's right.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add phybase in device structure
- From: Bo Shen
- [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-pcm: add dma support
- From: Bo Shen
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-pcm: add dma support
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-pcm: add dma support
- From: Bo Shen
- [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add phybase in device structure
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-pcm: add dma support
- Next by Date: Re: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-pcm: add dma support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add phybase in device structure
- Index(es):
 |