Ancient ac97_clock question.

[Stefan Linnemann <mazur@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

   Please Cc: me any reply, as I don't subscribe to the mailing list.
    With the (to me) recent update from kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8.i686 to
2.6.25.6-27.fc8.i686, my sound suddenly was always too fast.  After research I discovered the intel8x0 (which I have) ac97_clock option, and from my old /var/log/messages I discovered, that before it was always set to a value averaging to 41137.  However, the ALSA-documentation mentions ac97_clock=1194 explicitly.
   My question is: is 41194 a better value, or should I stick with the calculated average from the measurements from before?  I know it's an inaudible difference, unless I duplicate my machine ans let them play side by side, but I have a need to be precise and accurate.  (Aperger syndrome).

With kind regards,
Stefan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sound" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html