Re: virsh undefine --nvram

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:28:34AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 04:08:20PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > Hello -
> >
> > The virsh(1) man page says:
> >
> > > --nvram and --keep-nvram specify accordingly to delete or keep nvram (/domain/os/nvram/) file.
> >
> > However on my Fedora 39 system with libvirt 9.7.0, using "virsh
> > undefine --nvram" option appears to leave the NVRAM backing file:
> >
> > cel@boudin:~$ ls ~/.config/libvirt/qemu/nvram
> > guestfs-02a4oblo9vg7888d_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-7hmiolqcqwz5b0qs_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-el7lqymnwgzpnr38_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-jp0tfneh205xjrh8_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-mhqbp4gwmqsuu9w3_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-sat7x2kgpg9opjds_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-vhhi476rsq7vh83z_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-177mrq9xrb5589wl_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-88p8heyq1j0sy8bk_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-gxul3j9e1h3po19o_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-k0jf8msw4kh3yuff_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-oakcwpbozezvids8_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-sinmkv97r4k4dzcd_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-vj5cu9hgwcv0f18u_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-6jnim67ceme3h369_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-89g707uzdttxb9hv_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-h6vzt9zqxhoxx0hj_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-k4hw4gkcq8u0eebj_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-pljksgeblxgyf0pw_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-t8bnntykpzm3qvh2_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-ynbxqtj01sn4ovwy_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-6sqhenv6ditrq410_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-at8lndx32y69bjmg_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-ht0uycdn3vwdozad_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-lfy19ftph83jo4v0_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-qj0c2u9w2k4ors6h_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-tmq0h36spng4vtwk_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-7erqks7ks5c8rj38_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-ba2kzqxb1pna12l5_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-is7avsxjtnig5kgb_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-m3nrhs3x58rlget9_VARS.qcow2  guestfs-rilsled4ff9wvk6v_VARS.qcow2
> > guestfs-veebmlno2okc7c8h_VARS.qcow2
> > cel@boudin:~$
> >
> > Or perhaps I do not understand what these files are.
> 
> Based on the names, I believe those have been created by libguestfs.
> 
> Rich, is it possible that libguestfs doesn't use
> VIR_DOMAIN_UNDEFINE_NVRAM when cleaning up after itself?

Libguestfs uses transient VMs, so there's no Undefine operation that
will ever be invoked.

We have a feature gap here in that we don't provide a mechanism for
apps to say they want clean up of NVRAM and TPM state for transient
VMs.

We can't automatically clean up after transient VMs, as some will be
intended to be restarted later.

We already have VIR_DOMAIN_CREATE_AUTO_DESTORY which libguests uses
to guarantee the VM is killed if libguest is killed. Again though,
we can't assume that AUTO_DESTORY implies cleanup.


Perhaps we need a VIR_DOMAIN_CREATE_AUTO_CLEANUP flag for
virDomainCreateXML ?

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux