On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:06:27AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 02:40:07AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Michal, have you actually looked at the patch mentioned earlier? If > > not, you can perhaps do a clean room implementation of the fix based > > on the information provided above and get us out of this stalemate? > > > > It's quite a simple change, but having seen the original patch I feel > > like I couldn't possibly submit it myself and still be in the clear. > > We're over thinking things here. The way this change is implemented > is the only way anyone would write this code, and is a simple cut+paste > from the code pattern in the lines above so arguably already a derived > work. This is not a bit of code that meets the criteria to taint you > from a copyright POV. > > I just implemented & posted the obvious fix in virArch and it is > identical to the patch referenced earlier in this thread, rather > proving my point. I trust your judgement on this, hence my R-b :) Thanks! -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
