On 6/29/20 12:43 PM, Paul O'Rorke wrote:
Thanks Laine,
I will take a look at Open vSwitch, it looks interesting.
I am a generalist, I need to know enough about a lot of things to get
many different tasks done, but do not have the in depth knowledge
required to "patch" anything. If I manage to wrangle a working solution
should I post it?
Even a list of the steps you took to implement it manuall external to
libvirt would be useful. Maybe that would inspire someone else to add
support in libvirt virtual networks. We used to put stuff like that in
the wiki, but I think the preferred location has changed / is changing
and I'm not sure at the moment what the new norm is.
Needless to say I would be supportive of said feature being implemented
by those more competent than I...
Jocularity aside, thanks for the heads up on Open vSwitch.
*Paul O'Rorke*
On 2020-06-29 9:13 a.m., Laine Stump wrote:
On 6/29/20 11:01 AM, Paul O'Rorke wrote:
Hi all,
I couldn't find any documentation on this, hopefully someone can
point me in the right direction.
I recently set up a sand-boxed environment for our developers. There
are domain controller(s), workstations and servers in there. The
whole thing is running on a single host using a "Virtual Network"
defined in virt-manager on that host.
Now I find I want to add more guests and there are not enough
resources on this one host. Can I somehow make this Virtual Network
available to two hosts? I do not want to move to a bridged network
and have to physically join the two hosts with a discrete link when
they are already on the same subnet at the host level.
Is that possible?
You might be able to this using OpenvSwitch (iow "probably can, but I
don't know the details" :-)) but libvirt doesn't have anything to set
it up for you; you would need to create and configure the OVS switch
outside of libvirt, then attach the libvirt guests to that switch
(using "<interface type='bridge'> ... <virtualport type='openvswitch'>
...")
I've idly thought about having this as a libvirt feature over the
years, but as I never have that many guests, it was never a personal
priority, and it wasn't immediately clear what was the best way to
handle, e.g. DHCP, and routing to the outside. Definitely "patches are
welcome" though :-)
