Re: NVDIMM sizes and DIMM hot plug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:22:46AM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:54:29 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
Hi,


I've found out that NVDIMM size and label size matter for regular
(non-NV) DIMM hot plug.  If the NVDIMM is not aligned correctly, the
guest OS will not accept the hot plugged memory and will complain with
messages such as

  Block size [0x8000000] unaligned hotplug range: start 0x225000000, size 0x10000000

The start address above is also reported within <memory> element of the
hot plugged memory in the domain XML:

  <address type='dimm' slot='1' base='0x225000000'/>

Apparently, in order to make memory hot plug working in the guest OS,
the inserted memory must be aligned to the platform memory alignment
(128 MB on x86_64).

I'd like to clarify, how libvirt makes the DIMM address above.  How is

If the address isn't provided in the device XML of the attached device,
libvirt attaches the device without any address at all and then
refreshes the address from qemu in 'qemuDomainUpdateMemoryDeviceInfo'.

OK, I can look into the QEMU source code, but I'd still like to have
some official confirmation, especially regarding possible pitfalls or
future changes.  We can't risk data loss.

the NVDIMM memory range determined?  According to my experiments, it
seems the NVDIMM specified <size> is taken, NVDIMM <label> size is
subtracted from it and the resulting value is reduced to the nearest
multiple of NVDIMM <alignsize>.  Is this observation correct?  Is it
guaranteed to be stable in future versions?  I need to determine the
right NVDIMM size to make the subsequent memory modules correctly
aligned and then I can't change the NVDIMM size, to not damage data
stored in the NVDIMM.


Unfortunatelly I didn't implement NVDIMM support so I don't know the
intricacies. I've cc'd Martin Kletzander who did that part.

Martin, do you know how the QEMU part is supposed to work?  I haven't
received any response on the QEMU list, do you know who could I ask
directly?


Sorry, no idea, it was actually Michal (Cc'd) who implemented it if I'm not
mistaken.

Additionally, when adjusting maxMemory due to NVDIMM presence, should I
increase it by the specified NVDIMM <size> or a different value?

Thank you,
Milan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux