On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:45:49AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 19:37 -0500, Joe Muro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am using python libvirt api to get domain information. When using a uri without specifying the socket path, an error occurs. > > > > uri = "qemu+ssh://myuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/system" > > conn = libvirt.open(uri) > > > > This results in the following: > > > > libvirt: XML-RPC error : internal error: received hangup event on socket > > > > If I append the socket path to the URI, it works. e.g. > > > > qemu+ssh://myuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/system?socket=/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock > > > > Is this the recommended way to construct an ssh uri? My concern is that the socket path may be different when connecting to different libvirt hosts. > > > > remote host is ubuntu 20.04 running libvirtd (libvirt) 6.0.0 under systemd > > Is the client machine running macOS by any chance? > > There is a long-standing issue where that platform will use different > paths for certain resources, including the libvirtd socket, and the > way it currently works is that the default socket path is chosen by > the client, so any mismatch will result in something like the above. > > The plan is to replace our use of nc with a custom virt-nc helper > that will link against libvirt on the host side and will thus be able > to use the default socket path appropriate for the system; however, > as far as I'm aware nobody is currently working on it. I've got patches which do most of the work, but need some polish and refactoring still to make acceptable. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
