On 3/13/19 2:26 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
IIUC, you are using the tap0 device, but it is not plugged anywhere. By that I mean there is one end that you created and passed through into the VM, but there is no other end of that. I can think of some complicated ways how to do what you are trying to, but hopefully the above explanation will move you forward and you'll figure out something better than what I'm thinking about right now. What usually helps me is to think of a way this would be done with hardware and replicate that as most of the technology is modelled after HW anyway. Or someone else will have a better idea. Before sending it I just thought, wouldn't it be possible to just have a veth pair instead of the tap device? one end would go to the VM and the other one would be used for the containers' macvtaps...
What I am trying to achieve is the most performant way to connect a set of containers to the KVM while having proper isolation. As the Linux bridge does not support port isolation I started with a 'bridge' networking and MACVLAN using a VLAN for each container, but this comes at the cost of bridging and the VLAN trunk on the KVM side. The simplest (and hopefully therefore most performant) solution I could come up with was using a 'virtio' NIC in the KVM, with 'direct' connection in 'vepa' mode to 'some other end' on the host, TAP in its simplest form, which Docker then uses for its MACVLAN network. I am not quite sure if I understood you correctly with the 'other end'. With the given configuration I would expect that one end of the TAP device is connected to the NIC in the KVM (and it actually is, it has an IP address assigned in the KVM and is serving the web configurator) and the other end is connected to the MACVLAN network of Docker. If this is not how TAP works, how do I then provide a 'simple virtual NIC' which has one end in the KVM itself and the other on the host (without using bridging or alike). I always thought then when using 'bridge' network libvirt does exactly that, it creates a TAP device on the host and assigns it to a bridge. According to the man page I have to specify both interfaces when creating the 'vdev' device, but how would I do that on the host with one end being in the KVM? br Lars _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users