On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 16:33,
Peter Krempa wrote: > AFAIK this change comes from oVirt. They recently started to use
> persistently defined VMs for their actions, but they define them before > use. And undefine them after done. > > I presume that they delete all inactive persistent VMs they find as > a way to "clean up" after themselves rather than just those they've > created. > > I presume their rationale is that oVirt is the only thing that should > deal with libvirt on the oVirt hypervisor node, but that sounds flawed. Thank you for your help, I managed to find the offending lines in the log and, yes, unfortunately you seem to be right. I will take it up in the oVirt bug tracker.
Thanks again,
Andy
|
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users