|
On 08/12/2015 05:49 PM, Fırat KÜÇÜK
wrote:
Hello, I think what you want is this: <network> <name>nn1</name> <forward mode='bridge'/> <bridge name='br-nn1'/> </network> https://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#examplesBridge (Originally a network with no <forward> element was considered to be a virtual network with bridge created by libvirt but no physical device attached. When support for networks that used an existing bridge was added, we had to maintain backward compatibility, so we decided that the new type of network would be identified by setting <forward mode='bridge'/> on a network that has a bridge name defined.)
No, that wouldn't have worked in any older release of libvirt. Perhaps you've forgotten that you previously had <forward mode='bridge'/> in your definition?
|
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
