On 08/10/2015 01:05 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 08/10/2015 12:41 AM, Michael Darling wrote: >> What's the status of the SATA controller migration bug? Are the patches for it expected to be in 2.4? >> Looks like they didn't make it into 2.3. > > That's a question better suited for the qemu developers than us. I'm > Cc'ing John Snow, who authored the qemu patches. John? > All of the issues I am aware of have been fixed for 2.4. If you run into issues, please report them to me and qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx. Thanks! >> Since you last wrote, if the SATA controller patches aren't in yet, is there any new way >> to avoid the SATA controller device, if you have no SATA devices? > > No, it is impossible for libvirt to remove the SATA controller - as I > explained in the email you replied to, if you start up a q35-based qemu > virtual machine, it will have a SATA controller at 00:1f.2 and there is > no way provided by qemu to prevent this, so we just have to live with it > until it's fixed in qemu. > -- —js _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
