Re: [libvirt] increase number of libvirt threads by starting tansient guest doamin - is it a bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/26/2014 07:22 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> [Disabling cross-post]
> 
> On 26.09.2014 12:21, ustermann78@xxxxxx wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>> thank you for your answer.
>> so if i understand that correctly, no matter if i shutdown or destroy
>> the domain and no matter if it is a transient or an persistent vm, the
>> thread should disappear, right?
>>
>> in my case they still exist, also an hour after i destroy the domain
>> (and don´t start any new one).
>>
>> i use libvirt-1.1.35 on fedora core 20, for information.
> 
> Well, can you attach gdb and see what is the new thread doing?

Also, we intentionally keep a pool of worker threads, in order to
minimize the overhead of creating and tearing down threads; the pool is
populated on demand.  If there is a free thread, we reuse it; otherwise
we create the new one.  A thread that has nothing to do is not wasting
resources while waiting around for a new reason to be used.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux