From: "Adam King" <kinga@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gary Hook" <garyrhook@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:39:38 PM
Subject: Re: ntpd in VM
To: "Gary Hook" <garyrhook@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:39:38 PM
Subject: Re: ntpd in VM
From: "Gary Hook" <garyrhook@xxxxxxxxx>
To: libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:25:47 PM
Subject: Re: ntpd in VM
To: libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:25:47 PM
Subject: Re: ntpd in VM
While I agree that running a time server in a VM is, at best, problematic, most of those nay-sayers have experience with VMware, xen and the like. Those aren't the only hypervisors out there, and the decision process should depend upon the hypervisor (to a significant degree), not just the idea of "can I do this in a VM?" Not all hypervisors are created equally.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Pierre Schweitzer <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,It is still a bad idea. I invite you to read here for the reasons why:
http://serverfault.com/a/106509/150152Cheers,On 09/12/2014 12:51 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> I was taught in kitty school that running a ntp server in a vm
> was a bad idea. Is that still the case?
>
My experience is somewhat different. VMWare has always been problematic with this, especially Linux guests.
I've run KVM based NTP servers inside vm's (2 as active:standby) and dozens of ntp clients inside vm's for over a year now and seen no adverse results.
Admittedly I've not been checking the drift but I can vouch for the results.
Regards
Adam King
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users