On 07/06/2014 01:23 PM, jayunit100@xxxxxxxxx wrote: [please don't top-post on technical lists] > Centos is not going to generally have the cutting edge stuff. For that why not try fedora which will generally package with the newest libraries from various packages, including qemu . > > I think the current fedora repos have qemu 2.1 qemu 2.1 is not released yet, but yes, rawhide (and therefore the fedora-virt-preview repo on Fedora 20) are currently shipping qemu 2.1-rc0 (and soon rc1). Note that 2.1-rc0 has a bug that prevents libvirt from using qemu properly, which upstream qemu hopes to have fixed in time for the actual 2.1 release. > >> On Jul 6, 2014, at 10:01 AM, kerwin <piaoyuankui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> WHY CentOS still using qemu-kvm 0.12? Because CentOS borrows from RHEL, and the engineers at Red Hat have determined that enterprise stability is worth backporting thousands of carefully vetted patches rather than rebasing potentially unstable code that picks up even more unaudited upstream commits. If you need newer code but still with assurances of enterprise quality performed by Red Hat, then consider using RHEL 7.0 (and CentOS 7 can't be too far behind...) -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
