On 02/18/2014 06:31 AM, h0rst wrote: > On Di, 2014-02-18 at 12:03 +0200, Laine Stump wrote: > >> You *really* should upgrade to a newer libvirt. > > I know that version 0.9.8 is very old. But to be honest i tried to avoid upgrading and compiling a newer version since i don't know if it has any effects on running VMs (but i haven't checked this yet). There should be no problem upgrading to a newer libvirt. We take great pains to ensure that a newer version of libvirt can be reloaded and gracefully understand the XML recorded by older versions, with no loss to running VMs. While there have been bugs on this front, they get caught and patched quickly, so by updating to something like the latest Fedora stable build (currently 1.1.3.3), you are even more likely to avoid these sorts of problems when compared to upgrading all the way to the master branch of libvirt. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
