On 12/13/2013 12:33 PM, scar wrote: > Gao feng @ 12/11/2013 01:49 AM: >> I have a machine running libvirt lxc, >> on this machine(host), the network configure looks like this >> eth0 is the physical nic, virbr0 is the bridge libvirt created, and vnet0 >> is the veth device created for libvirt lxc container. you can see, the eth0 >> is a port of virbr0, and the ip is assigned on virbr0. >> >> [snip] >> >> And in container >> >> I change the ip of eth0 to 192.168.122.33 and add a route rule >> ip route add default via 192.168.122.1 dev eth0 >> >> then the container can access the outside. >> >> I think it should work even you change the 192.168.x.x to the >> global ip. > > arrg thank you but this is all so confusing to me >< > > this is what my ifconfig and brctl show looks like on host machine: > http://pastebin.com/9f1HzXi5 > > i want to use 67.180.246.123 for the container > I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? I think you may setup the wrong bridge. try to set ip for virbr0 and make eth0 as a port of virbr0. _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
