guest daemon reading kvmclock - is it not needed or bad idea ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi 
(apologies for the previous post in html - was scrubbed in the list 
digest)

I've dug various posts and articles on host-guest time synchronization.
I could not conclude why it might be better to use ntpd in a guest rather 
than a daemon that reads from kvmclock 
and having NTP running on the host only
(assuming the guest OS is a recent linux and so the clock source is set to 
the paravirtualized kvm PVclock).

any clarifications are welcome, thanks!
Edoardo Comar


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

_______________________________________________
libvirt-users mailing list
libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux