I'm writing Go bindings, I was just wondering about PowerVM, maybe further ahead if nobody has done it I could give it a try. So, Does it mean the other functions more granular funtions are going to be deprecated at some point?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe it was probably just an oversight - our intention was that theOn Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:44:47PM -0500, Camilo Aguilar wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm so glad you added the new set of virConnectListAllDomains functions, it
> simplifies a lot our work!. I was only wondering why there is no support
> for PowerVM. Is it that it hasn't been developed or is there some technical
> hardship?
new API worked with all drivers. Feel free to send a patch for phyp if
you think you can manage to write the code.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
