Am 23.07.13 15:22, schrieb Eric Blake: > [please don't commandeer unrelated threads - when starting a new topic, > make sure you are NOT setting in-reply-to] I'm sorry. You're right. > On 07/23/2013 06:33 AM, Thomas Stein wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Can someone shed some light on the copy-storage-all feature? There are >> many hits on google. My current questions are. >> >> 1. is it possible to do a migrate --live --copy-storage-all .... without >> shared storage? > > Yes, that's the point of --copy-storage-all. > >> 2. Do i need to have a preexisting image on the destination node? > > I know there has been some work to get to the point of not having to > pre-create images on the destination, but am not sure of the current > state of that work. Fastest might be to just try it and see; the error > message should be sane if it still isn't implemented. > >> 3. Is this still true: >> >> The current implementation of --copy-storage-all uses a qemu interface >> that upstream qemu developers are reluctant to support, and risks >> running into problems. We have patches under review to use a new NBD >> server for migration when targeting qemu 1.4 with libvirt 1.0.2, with >> much less risk > > What version of libvirt and qemu are you using? Newer libvirt is indeed > able to use NBD migration for a much cleaner result. qemu-1.4.2 and libvirt-1.1.0. Do i have to use specific options for nbd migration? thank you thomas _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
