On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:35:28AM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > Just a stupid question: did you pin guest vcpus or NIC` hw queues? > Unpinned vm may seriously affect I/O performance when running on same > core set as NIC(hwraid/fc/etc). Thanks. No question is stupid. Obviously, this shouldn't be so slow at VM I/O so I'm missing something. In my defense, there is no single coherent set of documents on this stuff, unless those are kept in a secret place. It would be a fine thing if a few of the people who know all the "obvious" stuff about libvirt-based KVM configuration would collaborate and document it fully somewhere. When I Google "pinned vcpu" all the top responses are about Xen. I run KVM. I find mention that "KVM uses the linux scheduler for distributing workload rather than actually assigning physical CPUs to VMs," at http://serverfault.com/questions/235143/can-i-provision-half-a-core-as-a-virtual-cpu. Is that wrong? Are you suggesting RAID will end up on one CPU core, and if the VM ends up on the same core there's I/O trouble? I can see that for software RAID. But we're running hardware RAID. Isn't that handled in the hardware of the RAID controller? Isn't that the point of hardware RAID, to keep it off the CPU? In any case the slow IO is true of all the VMs, so presumably they're properly spread out over CPU cores (of which there are more than VMs, and each VM is configured to take only one), which would rule out the general problem being the shared use of any one core by other system processes. Whit _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
