On 03/21/2012 02:58 PM, Shawn Davis wrote: >> Older libvirt had a bug where it wouldn't parse qemu 1.0 version (the >> change from 3 digits to 2 confused the older libvirt). If you're going >> to go with self-built qemu, you might also want to try self-built >> libvirt 0.9.10. >> >> -- >> Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 >> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org >> > > I installed libvirt 0.9.10 from source and now virsh is not finding the > following: > > testa@testaT4:~$ virsh list > virsh: /usr/lib/libvirt-qemu.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_QEMU_0.9.4' not found > (required by virsh) Ouch - you've now got version mismatch, where you didn't completely uninstall the distro version, and your self-built version is installed in locations that pick up the distro version. Did you use the right configure flags? > I can't install qemu 1.0 and libvirt 0.9.10 through apt right? Ah, apt - are you on debian or ubuntu? I don't know as much about the versions that those distros are using (I'm personally using Fedora 16, along with the fedora-virt-preview repo, which gives 0.9.10 pre-built). > I assume I > had to get them from source. Anyways, please let me know how I can get > virsh to see that I have 0.9.10. Once I get this working and can run that > monitor command I will be in good shape. There might be someone already shipping a pre-built 0.9.10 apt, but I wouldn't know where to tell you to look, so building from source is the other alternative. If you build from libvirt.git, you can use './autobuild.sh --system' to help set the ./configure options that match with the typical installation directories for at least Fedora, but again, I don't know how that fares with the debian installation layout (and patches are welcome to autobuild.sh for anyone that wants to use it on a debian layout). -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
