to ease the review of commits to follow. Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c index fb64cda..aed7411 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c @@ -6374,12 +6374,24 @@ qemuBuildNumaArgStr(const virDomainDef *def, virCommandPtr cmd) int ret = -1; for (i = 0; i < def->cpu->ncells; i++) { + int cellmem = VIR_DIV_UP(def->cpu->cells[i].mem, 1024); + def->cpu->cells[i].mem = cellmem * 1024; + VIR_FREE(cpumask); + + if (!(cpumask = virBitmapFormat(def->cpu->cells[i].cpumask))) + goto cleanup; + + if (strchr(cpumask, ',')) { + virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s", + _("disjoint NUMA cpu ranges are not supported " + "with this QEMU")); + goto cleanup; + } + virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-numa"); virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "node,nodeid=%d", def->cpu->cells[i].cellid); virBufferAddLit(&buf, ",cpus="); - if (!(cpumask = virBitmapFormat(def->cpu->cells[i].cpumask))) - goto cleanup; /* Up through qemu 1.4, -numa does not accept a cpus * argument any more complex than start-stop. @@ -6387,16 +6399,8 @@ qemuBuildNumaArgStr(const virDomainDef *def, virCommandPtr cmd) * XXX For qemu 1.5, the syntax has not yet been decided; * but when it is, we need a capability bit and * translation of our cpumask into the qemu syntax. */ - if (strchr(cpumask, ',')) { - virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, "%s", - _("disjoint NUMA cpu ranges are not supported " - "with this QEMU")); - goto cleanup; - } virBufferAdd(&buf, cpumask, -1); - def->cpu->cells[i].mem = VIR_DIV_UP(def->cpu->cells[i].mem, - 1024) * 1024; - virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",mem=%d", def->cpu->cells[i].mem / 1024); + virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",mem=%d", cellmem); if (virBufferCheckError(&buf) < 0) goto cleanup; -- 2.0.0 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list