Re: Follow-up on .so version number question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/07/2014 12:35 PM, Tony Asleson wrote:
> Eric posted this a while back (ref:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-April/msg00226.html)
> without any apparent response/discussion.
> 
> Can someone please elaborate on this?

At this point, we really aren't too worried about libtool versioning
scheme.  We've kept our guarantee of library back-compat ever since that
email, with no complaints, so I'm not sure that changing anything now
makes any sense (I'm more worried about breaking status quo than I am
about violating libtool documentation suggestions)

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]