On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 07:35 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:50:22AM +0000, chen.fan.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:56 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > >> Currently we are only able to bind the whole domain to some host nodes > >> using the /domain/numatune/memory element. Numerous requests were > >> made to support host<->guest numa node bindings, so this series tries > >> to pinch an idea on how to do that using /domain/numatune/memnode > >> elements. > >> > >> That is incompatible with automatic numa placement (numad) since that > >> makes no sense. Also this disables any live changes to numa > >> parameters (the /domain/numatune/memory settings) since we cannot > >> change the settings given to qemu. > >Hi Martin, > > > > Sorry for that I have not observed this patch. I made a duplicated > >work about this recently. and I found this patch has not been updated > >for several days, but since the QEMU have extra supported "memory-file" > >and some flags/properties, this patches should be refactored. > > Do you plan to send a new version ? If not, Can I take over them? > > > > I'm completely re-factoring the numatune parsing code and reworking > few other things for this patch. For memory-file, that will be > automatically supported as well, but with Michal's patches. We > already have an option that says "use hugepages" and we would like to > re-use that instead of creating new device(s). > > But we will greatly value your input on these patches (both mine and > Michal's) when these hit the list. So if there's something else you > find missing or wrong, that should be added or fixed, let me know. Ok. Thanks, Chen > > Martin -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list