On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 17:11 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > This function exists in Xen 4.2 as well, in libxl.h. > > > > Any ideas on how to handle this? I'm not aware of an existing macro to > check for func 'foo' defined in header 'bar'. Is writing a custom macro > along these lines a good solution? A bad solution I tried was hacking > the test to check libxl version via libxl_get_version_info(), but that > API does not work if not running Xen. Given that it exists in everything from 4.2 onwards why do you need to check for it? >From the PoV of these tests (or any application generally) I'd have thought you wouldn't really care if you get this function from libxl.h directly or indirectly via libxl.h including _libxl_types.h. Ian. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list