On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:32:09PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 16/06/2014 16:23, Eric Blake ha scritto: > >On 06/16/2014 08:16 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>Il 16/06/2014 16:08, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: > >>>Is there some capability probing mechanism that can be used by > >>>management to detect the new feature? > >> > >>No, there isn't. > > > >Not even query-command-line-options? > > No, this is a (backwards-compatible) extension to how the option is parsed. But numa started appearing on query-command-line-options only after this patch got applied. It is not the semantics I would expect from query-command-line-options, but it is a hint that we have a QEMU version with the new numa option handling code. > > I suppose with QAPI introspection you could check if the QAPI type for -numa > is defined... Does this exist, or is it just an idea? -- Eduardo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list