Re: [PATCH] virNetDevGetLinkInfo: Don't report link speed if NIC's not up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13.06.2014 12:25, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/13/2014 12:34 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The kernel's more broken than one would think. Various drivers report
various (usually spurious) values if the interface is in other state
than 'up' . While on some we experience -EINVAL when read()-ing the
speed sysfs file, with other drivers we might get anything from 0 to
UINT_MAX. If that's the case it's better to not report link speed.
Well, the interface is not up anyway.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  src/util/virnetdev.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/util/virnetdev.c b/src/util/virnetdev.c
index 6f3a202..a551f98 100644
--- a/src/util/virnetdev.c
+++ b/src/util/virnetdev.c
@@ -1875,6 +1875,16 @@ virNetDevGetLinkInfo(const char *ifname,

      lnk->state = tmp_state;

+    /* Shortcut to avoid some kernel issues. If link is not up several drivers
+     * report several misleading values. While igb reports 65535, realtek goes
+     * with 10. To avoid muddying XML with insane values, don't report link
+     * speed if that's the case. */
+    if (lnk->state != VIR_INTERFACE_STATE_UP) {
+        lnk->speed = 0;
+        ret = 0;
+        goto cleanup;
+    }
+
      VIR_FREE(path);
      VIR_FREE(buf);

@@ -1901,11 +1911,7 @@ virNetDevGetLinkInfo(const char *ifname,
          goto cleanup;
      }

-    /* Workaround broken kernel API. If the link is unplugged then
-     * depending on the NIC driver, link speed can be reported as -1.
-     * However, the value is printed out as unsigned integer instead of
-     * signed one. Terrifying but true. */
-    lnk->speed = (int) tmp_speed == -1 ? 0 : tmp_speed;
+    lnk->speed = tmp_speed;

      ret = 0;
   cleanup:

ACK from me. Might want to give a short time for differing opinions (or
just push this and change as required up until the next release :-)


Right. I've pushed this one as it enables testing for every one of us running libvirt from git instead of having to manually apply the patch.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]