On 13.06.2014 11:23, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/13/2014 10:50 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:31:53AM +0300, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/13/2014 10:10 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:46:59AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The kernel's more broken than one would think. Various drivers report
various (usually spurious) values if the interface is down. While on
some we experience -EINVAL when read()-ing the speed sysfs file, with
other drivers we might get anything from 0 to UINT_MAX. If that's the
case it's better to not report link speed. Well, the interface is down
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/util/virnetdev.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virnetdev.c b/src/util/virnetdev.c
index 6f3a202..80ef572 100644
--- a/src/util/virnetdev.c
+++ b/src/util/virnetdev.c
@@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ virNetDevGetLinkInfo(const char *ifname,
char *buf = NULL;
char *tmp;
int tmp_state;
- unsigned int tmp_speed;
+ unsigned int tmp_speed; /* virInterfaceState */
You probably wanted to put this comment next to the line with
tmp_state and not tmp_speed.
if (virNetDevSysfsFile(&path, ifname, "operstate") < 0)
goto cleanup;
@@ -1875,6 +1875,16 @@ virNetDevGetLinkInfo(const char *ifname,
lnk->state = tmp_state;
+ /* Shortcut to avoid some kernel issues. If link is down (and
possibly in
+ * other states too) several drivers report several values.
While igb
+ * reports 65535, realtek goes with 10. To avoid muddying XML
with insane
+ * values, don't report link speed */
+ if (lnk->state == VIR_INTERFACE_STATE_DOWN) {
Also for VIR_INTERFACE_LOWER_LAYER_DOWN (verified by looking at the
speed reported by a macvtap device when its physdev is down). And I'm
not sure how to get an interface into "NOT_PRESENT" or "DORMANT" state,
but I would imagine that the speed should be 0 in those cases too.
I've seen many other states I have no idea how to achieve. Wouldn't
it make more sense to report the speed only if the state is UP?
That makes enough sense to me that I changed my netcf patch to do just
that - it sets speed to 0 unless operstate is "up". Still open for
debate though :-) I just sent the patch to
netcf-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So I'm not applying this patch then and proposing a different one:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-June/msg00647.html
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list