[PATCH 2/3] build: remove ssp-buffer-size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This option only makes sense for -fstack-protector.
With -fstack-protector-all or -fstack-protector-strong,
functions are protected regardless of buffer size.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105456
---
 m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 | 13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4 b/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4
index fb82238..196afa7 100644
--- a/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4
+++ b/m4/virt-compile-warnings.m4
@@ -166,16 +166,11 @@ AC_DEFUN([LIBVIRT_COMPILE_WARNINGS],[
        *-*-linux*)
        dnl Fedora only uses -fstack-protector, but doesn't seem to
        dnl be great overhead in adding -fstack-protector-all instead
-       dnl wantwarn="$wantwarn -fstack-protector"
+       dnl
+       dnl We also don't need ssp-buffer-size with -all,
+       dnl since functions are protected regardless of buffer size.
+       dnl wantwarn="$wantwarn --param=ssp-buffer-size=4"
        wantwarn="$wantwarn -fstack-protector-all"
-       wantwarn="$wantwarn --param=ssp-buffer-size=4"
-       dnl Even though it supports it, clang complains about
-       dnl use of --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 unless used with
-       dnl the -c arg. It doesn't like it when used with args
-       dnl that just link together .o files. Unfortunately
-       dnl we can't avoid that with automake, so we must turn
-       dnl off the following clang specific warning
-       wantwarn="$wantwarn -Wno-unused-command-line-argument"
        ;;
        *-*-freebsd*)
        dnl FreeBSD ships old gcc 4.2.1 which doesn't handle
-- 
1.8.5.5

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]