On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:48:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c > index 4818cfb..b77914e 100644 > --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c > +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c > @@ -17524,7 +17524,7 @@ virDomainDefFormatInternal(virDomainDefPtr def, > goto error; > } > virBufferAsprintf(buf, > - "<memnode nodeid='%zu' mode='%s' nodeset='%s'/>\n", > + "<memnode cellid='%zu' mode='%s' nodeset='%s'/>\n", > i, mode, nodemask); > VIR_FREE(nodemask); > } Presumably this belongs in an earlier patch in the series. > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c > index b1bfb5a..ce03a4f 100644 > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c > @@ -588,6 +588,8 @@ qemuSetupCpusetCgroup(virDomainObjPtr vm, > if (!virCgroupHasController(priv->cgroup, VIR_CGROUP_CONTROLLER_CPUSET)) > return 0; > > + /* ASDF: per-node pinnings are not reflected here */ Are you refering to per-node vCPU pinnings here ? We already have a per-vCPU pin capability in both the XML and the cgroup setup code and the new <memnode> affinity mask you're adding presumably only applies to memory, not vCPUs, otherwise we'd be effectively having two places to set the same info. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list