Ján Tomko wrote:
> > + for (i = 0; i < def->ncontrollers; i++) {
> > + if (def->controllers[i]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_TYPE_PCI) {
> > + if (def->controllers[i]->info.type != VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE)
> > + continue;
> > + if (def->controllers[i]->model == VIR_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_MODEL_PCI_ROOT)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (virDomainPCIAddressReserveNextSlot(addrs,
> > + &def->controllers[i]->info,
> > + VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCI) < 0)
> > + goto error;
> > + }
>
> I think unsupported controllers don't need PCI slots.
I've been thinking about that and appears that block could be dropped
completely. The only controller we explicitly operate with is of type
'PCI'.
Possible models for pci controllers are: pci-root, pcie-root,
pci-bridge and dmi-to-pci-bridge.
Bhyve only supports pci-root that doesn't need an address. So appears
this block of code should be dropped?
Roman Bogorodskiy
Attachment:
pgper3fLoTjb7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list