On 05/13/2014 03:21 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: > On 05/11/2014 08:48 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: >> Introduce new files (domain_addr.[ch]) to provide >> an API for domain device handling that could be >> shared across the drivers. >> >> + * Author: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> >> + */ >> + > > I think you should be the author, since you created the file. > Most of the structs and functions were (re)written by Laine anyway and we have > the copyrights and git history for attributions. > But I'd like to hear a second opinion on this. Per-file authorship is an awkward concept in the age of multiple contributors. When copying and pasting from another file, I tend to preserve the original author if I used most of the code intact, or drop the line entirely if I'm going to do a rewrite. The git log is much more authoratative than an author comment in the file, so I don't care enough to require you to change it - if you are comfortable claiming the work, put your own name. > > The rest is just code movement and renaming, ACK. > -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list