On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > On 04/30/2014 12:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:54:26PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > >> > >> Looks like FreeBSD does not support such kind of per-cpu reporting for > >> host cpus. Just to make sure I didn't miss something, I asked that > >> question of the FreeBSD virtualization maillist and looks like I'm right > >> about that [1]. > >> > >> Would it better to abandon this feature for now and wait when it'd be > >> supported (I'm not sure if/when it's going to happen), or just leave the > >> code that reports only the stats for all cpus? > > > > I think it is better to leave it unsupported, so apps can see the > > VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT error and not mistakenly interpret incorrect data. > > > > The apps should check how many stat parameters are supported for a given pCPU > by calling virDomainGetCPUStats with nparams=0 and/or check the actual number > of stats returned. > > Could we return valid results for total CPU stats (start_cpu = -1) and just > not return any for all other start_cpu values? Wouldn't that just be duplicating what we already provide via the virDomainGetInfo cpuTime field ? If so it doesn't seem like we need to add this feature to virDomainGetCPUStats too ? Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list