Re: Test failures with newest gnutls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> after upgrade to gnutls-3.3.0, I discovered (commandtest fails) that
> any code linked with -lgnutls will have not 3, but 5 open file
> descriptors upon the entry into main().  I asked on gnutls-help [1] if
> they know they are leaking file descriptors.  The response was, that
> this is intended with the explanation being that these FDs (pointing
> to /dev/urandom) are kept open for backward compatibility with
> programs that may chroot into environment without /dev/urandom as the
> previous version didn't require to have access to /dev/urandom when
> calling gnutls code.
> 
> Does that seem like our bug that we're relying on fixed number of open
> file descriptors?  Or that we're linking to gnutls when we don't need
> it in commandhelper?  Or should this be fixed somewhere else?

Hmm, before considering the test suite - what is the behaviour when
we use virCommand for real. ie if we launch QEMU, is gnutls causing
us to leak a /dev/urandom FD to QEMU ?  Or is the fact that we
iterate over all FDs forcing them to be close saving us.

IMHO it is really dubious that GNUTLS would open file descriptors
in a library constructor function :-(

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]