On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:53:00AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 10:06 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > IIUC libxl_domain_shutdown() will use the Xen paravirt channel > > to trigger a controlled shutdown in the guest. Currently we have > > the following flags defined > > > > VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_DEFAULT = 0, /* hypervisor choice */ > > VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_ACPI_POWER_BTN = (1 << 0), /* Send ACPI event */ > > VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_GUEST_AGENT = (1 << 1), /* Use guest agent */ > > VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_INITCTL = (1 << 2), /* Use initctl */ > > VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_SIGNAL = (1 << 3), /* Send a signal */ > > > > None of those really map to the Xen paravirt shutdown > > It's not a million miles away from VIR_DOMAIN_SHUTDOWN_GUEST_AGENT if > you consider the bit of the kernel which responds to the paravirt > shutdown request as an agent of sorts. With Windows PV drivers I think > this is even literally a userspace component. > > Not that having a more explicit type is a bad idea, but I thought I'd > mention it. I guess my rationale for suggesting a new flag is that it is conceivable that Xen could support the virtio-console devices, in which case it would be possible for someone to configure a Xen guest with the QEMU (or another) guest agent provided shutdown facility. In such a scenario, it'd thus be desirable for the API to be able to distinguish Xen paravirt control from the guest agent. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list