Re: [PATCH] virsh: Separate 'create'/'modify' message for secret-define

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:20:26 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:27:10AM -0400, Li Yang wrote:
> >The current message of secret-define always be:
> >Secret 09a9736f-eedb-449c-9983-80d0ab67393f created
> >
> >even you just modify the secret, perhaps this may puzzle
> >uses. Now this patch make the modify action output message
> >like this:
> >Secret f2d1bafc-ac58-4a47-93e4-47723686fef5 modified
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Li Yang <liyang.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > tools/virsh-secret.c |   16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/virsh-secret.c b/tools/virsh-secret.c
> >index 10d5db3..d1cbe04 100644
> >--- a/tools/virsh-secret.c
> >+++ b/tools/virsh-secret.c
> >@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include "virutil.h"
> > #include "virxml.h"
> > #include "conf/secret_conf.h"
> >+#include "viruuid.h"
> >
> > static virSecretPtr
> > vshCommandOptSecret(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd, const char **name)
> >@@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ cmdSecretDefine(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
> >     char *buffer;
> >     virSecretPtr res;
> >     char uuid[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
> >+    virSecretDefPtr new_attrs;
> >     bool ret = false;
> >
> >     if (vshCommandOptStringReq(ctl, cmd, "file", &from) < 0)
> >@@ -104,6 +106,12 @@ cmdSecretDefine(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
> >     if (virFileReadAll(from, VSH_MAX_XML_FILE, &buffer) < 0)
> >         return false;
> >
> >+    new_attrs = virSecretDefParseString(buffer);
> >+    if (new_attrs == NULL){
> >+        VIR_FREE(buffer);
> >+        return false;
> >+    }
> >+
> >     if (!(res = virSecretDefineXML(ctl->conn, buffer, 0))) {
> >         vshError(ctl, _("Failed to set attributes from %s"), from);
> >         goto cleanup;
> >@@ -114,10 +122,16 @@ cmdSecretDefine(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd)
> >         goto cleanup;
> >     }
> >
> >-    vshPrint(ctl, _("Secret %s created\n"), uuid);
> >+    char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
> >+    virUUIDFormat(new_attrs->uuid, uuidstr);
> >+    if (memcmp(uuid, uuidstr, VIR_UUID_BUFLEN) == 0)
> >+        vshPrint(ctl, _("Secret %s modified\n"), uuid);
> >+    else
> >+        vshPrint(ctl, _("Secret %s created\n"), uuid);
> >     ret = true;
> 
> You'll still print 'modified' if the new created secret has an uuid in
> the file already, plus it does more parsing, etc.  Wouldn't it be
> easier to just do s/created/defined/ ?

Also you compare just the first VIR_UUID_BUFLEN characters in UUID
string. I agree with Martin.

Jirka

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]