Re: [PATCH] RFC: bhyve: implement PCI address allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Laine Stump wrote:

> On 04/13/2014 08:53 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the first attempt to implement PCI address allocation for the
> > bhyve driver. This patch is by no means a complete version and the idea
> > of this is to understand if I'm moving in a right direction.
> >
> > This code is based on the one from QEMU driver.
> 
> Rather than doing a cut/paste of the qemu code, it would be greatly more
> desirable to move the pci address allocation from qemu into a library
> that is accessible from both drivers. This will eliminate dual
> maintenance headaches in the future.

Extracting common code into a library makes a perfect sense. But before
doing that I'd like to have a complete and functional implementation for
bhyve (not necessarily pushed). When it's done, it'd be more or less
obvious which parts of the code should be shared, otherwise there's a
risk of extracting the code from Qemu which would not be used by Bhyve. 

> Projects like this can tend to be painful, but in the end it means that
> when someone using qemu finds and fixes a bug, it will automatically be
> fixed for bhyve. And. for example, when the qemu driver adds support for
> PCIe "root-port" controllers and upstream/downstream switches[*], the
> bhyve driver will automatically get address allocation support for those
> controllers too (if/when it implements the controllers).
> 
> 
> 
> Or is there some particular reason that makes it better to keep it
> separate (or maybe some other conversation that I missed, or have
> forgotten)?

I don't see a reason to keep it separate at this point, but as I've
mentioned above, I think it'd make sense for me to complete the current
patch in a way it as and then analyze what parts need to be shared.

I don't think you've missed any conversations on that topic.

> [*]For reference, here is a description of the various PCI controller
> types - the design in this email is fairly close to what was eventually
> implemented, except that the actual code uses a "model" attribute to the
> controller element, rather than a separate <model> subelement:
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-April/msg01144.html
> 
> (root-port, upstream-switch-port, and downstream-switch-port weren't
> implemented at the time, because they weren't immediately useful)
> 
> >  Even though bhyve currently
> > has no support for PCI bridges, it should be possible to add that
> > support without major rewrites when this feature will be available in bhyve.
> >
> > So, currently we have the following.  For a domain like that:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/novel/10569989#file-domainin-xml
> >
> > The processed domain looks this way:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/novel/10569989#file-domainout-xml
> >
> > and the command is:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/novel/10569989#file-cmd
> >
> > Please let me know if it's uncomfortable to follow gist links; I didn't 
> > put domain xml inline as it's pretty lengthy.
> >
> > Open questions are:
> >
> >  * What's the best way to deal with the 0:0,hostbridge device, should it
> >    be explicitly added to the domain definition?
> 
> No. Slot 0 on each PCI controller is considered to be reserved, and
> doesn't show up in the domain definition. The address allocation code
> takes that into account.

Good.

> >  * How to handle lpc device, that's required for console. From bhyve point
> >    of view it looks like this:
> >  
> >      -s 31,lpc -l com1,ttydev
> >
> >    That is, LPC PCI-ISA bridge on PCI slot and com1 port on that bridge.
> 
> We don't model the ISA bus for qemu, and also don't support adding any
> device to the ISA bus (although qemu has one). I think you can just
> directly define a serial character device with port='0':
> 
>     <serial type='pty'>
>       <target port='0'/>
>     </serial>
> 

Bhyve uses 'nmdm' type console now, and it requires the ISA bridge and
ISA bus (more details on that in commit
6c91134de46ea481fa36c008c0a3667cbd088f1c), unfortunately.

Thanks,

Roman Bogorodskiy

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]