On 04/08/2014 07:45 PM, yangzy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I am looking forward to any exchange of view of whether >> multi-tracer framework(ftrace including) is necessary. >> > > Ping! > Regards > Yang Zhiyong If you can propose patches that are minimally invasive (no more than ONE additional conditional check when ftrace is disabled), and which do not violate licensing, then we can look at them. But right now, the ball is back in your court; I'm not sure what you are pinging for, because Dan's analysis was pretty fair that the first version you posted is not ready for inclusion, and that you may be fighting an uphill battle. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list