[forwarding my answer back to the list] Pasquale, please keep the discussion on the list, you should probably use the "Reply To All" (or whatever GMail calls it) button when answering. At Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:09:31 +0200, Claudio Bley wrote: > > [Remember /not/ to top-post on technical lists.] > > At Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:28:28 +0200, > Pasquale Dir wrote: > > > > Hello, > > is it ok if I'll send multiple patches for each added function? I'd start > > with the getCPUStats which is the most complex as it introduces new jna > > types too. > > Yes, that would be a good start. (although I'd probably do it in > reverse, starting out with the small changes, then tackling the > complex ones). > > > As for Thread.sleep() is it ok to substitute it with a wait(long) ? Or you > > have any alternative? That wait is needed for the alghoritm to work. > > I'm not convinced that this functionality belongs into the library at > all. Maybe we could add a convenience method doing the computation > for two given stats and a time period, but I don't feel strongly in > support of adding this method. > > Regards, > Claudio -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list