Re: [PATCH v3] Introduce --without-pm-utils to get rid of pm-is-supported dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:35:51PM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > This uses the dbus api of systemd to check the power management
> > capabilities of the node.
> > ---
> >  Diff with v2:
> >    * Fixed a few dbus call problems
> > 
> >  configure.ac              | 11 +++++++++
> >  libvirt.spec.in           |  9 ++++++++
> >  src/libvirt_private.syms  |  3 +++
> >  src/util/virnodesuspend.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  src/util/virsystemd.c     | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  src/util/virsystemd.h     |  6 +++++
> >  6 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
> 
> Could you also add a test to  tests/virsystemdtest.c to exercuse
> these hekper APIs.

Will do it.

> > diff --git a/src/util/virnodesuspend.c b/src/util/virnodesuspend.c
> > index 8088931..ba4a338 100644
> > --- a/src/util/virnodesuspend.c
> > +++ b/src/util/virnodesuspend.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
> >  #include <config.h>
> >  #include "virnodesuspend.h"
> >  
> > +#ifndef WITH_PM_UTILS
> > +# include "virsystemd.h"
> > +#endif
> >  #include "vircommand.h"
> >  #include "virthread.h"
> >  #include "datatypes.h"
> > @@ -260,6 +263,7 @@ int nodeSuspendForDuration(unsigned int target,
> >   *
> >   * Returns 0 if the query was successful, -1 on failure.
> >   */
> > +#ifdef WITH_PM_UTILS
> >  static int
> >  virNodeSuspendSupportsTarget(unsigned int target, bool *supported)
> >  {
> > @@ -300,6 +304,34 @@ virNodeSuspendSupportsTarget(unsigned int target, bool *supported)
> >      virCommandFree(cmd);
> >      return ret;
> >  }
> > +#else /* ! WITH_PM_UTILS */
> > +static int
> > +virNodeSuspendSupportsTarget(unsigned int target, bool *supported)
> > +{
> > +    int ret = -1;
> > +
> > +    if (virNodeSuspendInitialize() < 0)
> > +        return -1;
> > +
> > +    *supported = false;
> > +
> > +    switch (target) {
> > +    case VIR_NODE_SUSPEND_TARGET_MEM:
> > +        ret = virSystemdCanSuspend(supported);
> > +        break;
> > +    case VIR_NODE_SUSPEND_TARGET_DISK:
> > +        ret = virSystemdCanHibernate(supported);
> > +        break;
> > +    case VIR_NODE_SUSPEND_TARGET_HYBRID:
> > +        ret = virSystemdCanHybridSleep(supported);
> > +        break;
> > +    default:
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return ret;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* WITH_PM_UTILS */
> 
> Rather than having a hardcoded choice of pm-utils vs systemd
> I think we should check if the systemd service is running and
> if so use it, otherwise fallback to pm-utils. That way if 
> someone has systemd installed, but is not running it as their
> init, things would still work

The idea is also to be able to drop the Requires: pm-utils in the spec
file... so a runtime check wouldn't help this.

--
Cedric

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]