On 04/01/2014 06:11 PM, Ján Tomko wrote: > When looking up a net device by a MAC and PCI address, it is possible > that we've got a match on the MAC address but failed to match the > PCI address. > > In that case, outputting just the MAC address can be confusing. > > Partially resolves: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872028 > --- > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c > index 1624c7e..35defaf 100644 > --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c > +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c > @@ -10456,9 +10456,20 @@ virDomainNetFindIdx(virDomainDefPtr def, virDomainNetDefPtr net) > } > } > if (matchidx < 0) { > - virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, > - _("no device matching mac address %s found"), > - virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac)); > + if (PCIAddrSpecified) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, > + _("no device matching mac address %s found on " > + "%.4x:%.2x:%.2x.%.1x"), > + virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac), > + net->info.addr.pci.domain, > + net->info.addr.pci.bus, > + net->info.addr.pci.slot, > + net->info.addr.pci.function); We really should make a virPCIAddrFormat() function and start using it... That's a separate issue though. ACK to this patch. > + } else { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_FAILED, > + _("no device matching mac address %s found"), > + virMacAddrFormat(&net->mac, mac)); > + } > } > return matchidx; > } -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list