Re: [PATCH 1/2] Treat zero cpu shares as a valid value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/04/2014 03:30 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:13:14PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
>> Currently, <cputune><shares>0</shares></cputune> is treated
>> as if it were not specified.
>>
> 
> s/were/was/ in this particular case, I guess.
> 

I think this particular case is a perfectly cromulent use of the past
subjunctive to express a counterfactual condition.

> ACK,
> 
> Martin
> 

Thank you for the review, I will take another look at the series before
pushing, since this was an RFC.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]